Wednesday, July 01, 2009

Perception And Prodding: Did I Bury Paul, Or Is It That I'm Very Bored?

I remember very little about my eighth grade year of school. My father, who had divorced my mother almost a decade earlier and I had barely seen, died due to cancer. I don't know if I was in a fog because the time was so painful that I blocked most moments from memory as people going through what most would call a "life event" do, or if the raging hormones which were developing in me were clouding my perception, but there are few things I remember from that time. Flashes sometimes creep in, and while taking a moment to relax today I found myself thinking about perception and social studies.

I confront religious adherents on a fairly regular basis regarding the fictional nature of their beliefs. As I've written before, I've come to a point where I've survived and learned about what I consider to be too many years and too much history regarding religion's ability to addle minds with unfounded promises & outright lies, incite horrible acts of bigotry & violence, and limit humanity's intellectual progress. Today, however, a memory from that year crept into my awareness while I was considering the perception of a fairly eloquent sixteen year old who was writing to me regarding how he could not be "brainwashed" by religion since he studied it himself before choosing to be a follower and that he made his "own" choice to do so - albeit how convenient that his parents were of the same religion! - and that while he sometimes questions the voracity of scriptural stories regarding his faith, he's glad to be comforted by the church youth pastor who helps him through the tough bits.

Never mind the fact that when I asked him if he'd read the "bible" cover to cover, he said "No." Never mind the fact that when I asked him if his youth pastor had read the "bible" cover to cover that answer was ALSO no. He just KNEW that he'd been right to choose Christianity.

... but I digress.


The discourse got me thinking about my eighth-grade social studies teacher, Mr. Arashiro.

Mr. Arashiro was a small man, no more than five-foot-four. He wore simple wire-framed glasses, usually dressed in the same suit five days in a row (presumably to save on dry-cleaning, but I'd also wager it was a tribute to a trait I share with Einstein of buying multiple items of the same clothing in order to save brain power when deciding what to wear), and his thick, straight black hair usually looked as if it had not been washed for days.

I have to admit, I neither liked nor disliked Mr. Arashiro during the time I was his student. Being in the fog I was in due to depression over my father's death, combined with the raging hormones causing me to consistently notice that cutie Kari Hardcastle in the desk near mine, I remember very little from his class. However, one day came back to me vividly as I thought about the young man I'd been discussing religion with in a public internet forum earlier today.

Mr. Arashiro used to stand in the hall by the door to his classroom between periods. As the students entered and exited, he would sometimes talk to and/or throw pithy comments at former and/or current students as they passed. I walked in, he smiled as he usually did the times my eyes met his, and I noticed something unusual in his classroom.

A square, grey record player was resting on a small table in front of his blackboard.

I was very keen on music by the time I reached junior high, and I wondered what the device's purpose for being there might be.

I settled into my desk, placed my books in the storage compartment under my seat, noted that Kari's face & hair looked especially cute that day, and watched Mr. Arashiro close the door vibrantly with a short slam as I remember him usually doing when the school bell rang.

He spoke. He held up a copy of the Beatles record, "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band." He explained that he wanted us to hear something but wouldn't tell us what it was. He played a portion of the record featuring multiple sound effects and voices at the end of the song "Strawberry Fields Forever." He paused.

"Now," Mr. Arashiro stated, "Listen to it again, and tell me what the man is saying when I point."

More garbled sound effects. The sound of a man talking, very unintelligibly, when he raised his finger.

"What was it?"

No one knew.

He said, "Listen for the man to say 'I Buried Paul.'"

He played it again. The scratch of the record, the sound effects, the garble of voices... there it was. The man was definitely saying, "I buried Paul."

Right?

Mr. Arashiro took another moment. He made it clear that we, as a class, had heard it incorrectly.

"Listen for the man to say, 'I'm very bored.'"

Wait a minute. He's right.

He repeated the exercise more than a few times, to illustrate the point.

Go ahead, get your copy of "Sgt. Pepper's" out and try it for yourself. It's nigh impossible to be absolutely sure which phrase the voice is saying. Beatles fans, as I learned some time later, have been dissecting the recording for years as it relates to a hidden story, a macabre "Easter Egg" as such things are called, whereby Paul McCartney supposedly died, was secretly disposed of, and replaced by a lookalike named Billy Shears.


The license plate on the "Abbey Road" album reads "28 IF," the age Paul supposedly would have been at the time of the release, and Lennon is dressed like a gravedigger, or so the legend goes... but again, I digress!


What Mr. Arashiro taught me at the age of fourteen was that in the absence of clarity, perception can be controlled.


Religious leaders will tell you the tingling you feel in what they call your "heart" is the touch of a deity. However, many have noted (myself included) that you also get the same feeling when a cool twist happens in a good film, or when an artist you like is playing a song you love at a rock concert, or when the person you've had your eye on tells you he or she loves you or wants to kiss you.

Keep in mind also, your heart has NO nerve endings Anything related to your heart is actually the constriction of muscles and/or blood pressue.


Unless mentally damaged, sociopathic, or utterly uncaring, most humans have emotions. We have emotional responses to much of what happens around us. If we are in a group and people are wailing and crying and saying they feel the "presence" of a deity, if we are inclined to believe in such a thing we may also feel such a thing.

However, no one has ever proven such a thing exists. In fact, what has been proven by scientists is that the muscles in the chest and throat contract when we are excited by something, and that we sometimes forget to breathe under such circumstances. The heart rate increases, pressure builds, and one feels a weight in the chest, neck, or face.

I can't help but notice that NO one has told me they have felt "god" in their hands, feet, or buttocks. FYI.


The first time I was told to ask "god" to come into my life, I did so with gusto. I believed the person who told me to do so for various reasons, and I described the event in an earlier essay. However, I felt nothing. When a warbling lady from the church I was at put her hand on my back and cried out to "god" to come into my heart (whatever that means), the only thing I felt was her hand on my back. But I am absolutely convinced that a person raised to believe in such a magical series of events could work themselves into an emotional state which results in the constriction/breathing problems described above and could most certainly convince themselves they felt the presence of a "god."

However - that does NOT make their beliefs true.


The young man I am discussing religion with on the internet believes he chose belief in a "god" of his own accord, but admits his parents have engaged in the very same religion he just happened to choose since before the time he was born.

I can't stop thinking about Mr. Arashiro flipping between orders.


"Listen for 'I buried Paul.'"

"Listen for 'I'm very bored.'"


Back. And forth. And back. And forth.


Here's the problem with religion, in a nutshell.... only ONE choice is given to young adherents; believe, or suffer.


It's quite easy to believe "I buried Paul" if that's the only choice you're told is the right one.



I'm very bored.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

I really HATE discussing religion on YouTube sometimes.

Maybe you can learn from my mistake.

I've watched religion addle minds with false promises, incite horrible acts of bigotry & violence, and limit humanity's intellectual progress for too many years. To confront people regarding the fictional nature of their beliefs, I sometimes visit the comment forums on YouTube. I suppose the following could be translated to mean I was pwn'd, but I find the whole scenario despicable.

One particularly fervent defender of faith wrote a comment to me that was almost complete gibberish. I noticed his profile stated his age as 28 and decided to ask if he'd been drinking. He responded by claiming I was accusing him of underage drinking. I pointed out his listed age made no indication he was a minor and asked his real age. He refused to answer and repeated his false charge. I asked him to put his parents in touch with me. He refused and repeated his false claim again. After a little time I made it clear I would no longer attempt to reason with an irrational child.

He wrote the following:
  • oh, so now im "irrational", why is that, becuase i wont let you talk to my parents or tell you my real age. the reason im not telling you my real age is because i have no idea if your somesort of crazy stalker. Kinda asking for some personal info there rick.


And now, as if by coincidence, I'm blocked from the forum.


I wanted to respond thusly:

  • Yes, irrational. Your profile said you're in your 20s. You typed a comment that made no sense. I asked if you'd been drinking. You claimed I accused you of underage drinking and repeated your claim even when I pointed out there was no way for me to know you were not the age your profile stated. I have no interest in stalking you. In fact, I'd rather you just leave me alone. I've asked to speak with your parents and you've refused to pass along the message. We're done, child.

But I can't. I'm blocked. I sent the message to the forum's owner but she hasn't responded yet.

The moral of the story, at least as far as I can tell:

A person who believes in religion will disparage the detractors of faith in any way, shape, or form; truth be damned.



(site of the carnage)


Addendum: A thought occurred.... If the person running the site is willing to block me, it's likely she'll have the audacity to delete my comments as well. Ah, yes... a PDF of the entire comment section will preserve things nicely.

Addendum #2: Hey, guess what.... I've been UNBLOCKED from the forum. I guess the operator decided not to be a fascist after all. Yay.

Addendum #3: Okay, now I'm blocked again. What idiocy this is.

Addendum #4: (6/19) For fun, I figured I'd try to respond to the twerp with the message I listed above one more time. After pasting the message into a reply box, YouTube's system indicated it did not accept the comment. I assumed I was still blocked and moved on to some other things. After a while I happened back upon the page and came across a message addressed to me from another user. Not noticing I was in the forum I was supposedly blocked in, I wrote a reply. A very strange thing happened. After I clicked "POST COMMENT," YouTube didn't indicate it posted the comment. Rather, the button stayed gray as if still working on it for quite a few minutes. I copied the page URL, closed the window, and re-opened it. The message I posted to one user appeared UNDER the message I described in this article. I deleted the message since it was not directed at the first person and attempted to recreate the error. Now, YouTube is back to not letting me post in the forum. WEIRD.

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Douglas Adams: Parrots, the Universe, and Everything

If you've got an hour and a half to spare, this wonderful talk by author Douglas Adams is well worth it.

Saturday, June 06, 2009

Spare Some Change??!?!?!?

There's a guy that asks EVERYONE (and I mean EVERYONE) for spare change most weekdays around 4pm near Wilshire & 3rd in Santa Monica. I was walking behind a group of tourists and this is what he said to them, shotgun style:

"Spare some change sir? Spare some change ma'am? Spare some change ma'am? Spare some change sir? Spare some change ma'am? Spare some change ma'am? Spare some change sir?"


... and of course, one for me. "Spare some change, sir?"



Fuck. Working at McDonald's would be easier.

Friday, May 29, 2009

What Do You Mean, Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 Contradict?!?!??


I sometimes engage in what could loosely be called "debate" with religious nutjobs on that bastion of intellectuality known as YouTube. Today, for what feels like the millionth time, I was told that the contradictions regarding the supposed order of creation as described in Genesis 1 and 2 are just misunderstandings. As per usual, the person I was discussing things with said I was wrong. He then attempted to claim that Genesis 1 is about the actual creation, while Genesis 2 is only about "activity in the garden," or some such nonsense.


Here's the short version of the truth:

  • Gen1: Animals are made first, then humans.
... but!
  • Gen2:7 "God" makes man from dust.
  • Gen2:19 ... And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air. Man complains none of the animals are suitable helpers.
  • Gen2:22 (THEN, "god" takes Adam's rib and) ...made he a woman.

Of course, the response I invariably receive after posting something like that is usually along the lines of, "You're reading it wrong!" or "You don't understand because scripture cannot be understood by those who have their eyes closed!"

... soooooo many fallacies in that last position.... and are humans really supposed to believe that MAN (penis?) was intended to exist, but not WOMAN?


But I digress....


Since I find it very annoying to have to post multiple messages due to YouTube's character limits in the public forums, I figured I'd delineate the discrepancies here for easy reference.

Feel free to whip out a King James version of the so-called "holy bible" and follow along, kiddies. My understanding is that Hebrew texts are similar.


What's that - you use an NIV, or some other edition?


Yeah, about that... those were edited to REMOVE contradictions and mistakes in the original text, including references to UNICORNS.

F.Y.I.



The Order of Creation Contradictions

Genesis 1
  • 1. Heavens and Earth
  • 2. Light
  • 3. Heaven is separated from water
  • 4. Dry land
  • 5. Plants
  • 6. The sun
  • 7. The moon
  • 8. Stars
  • 9. Water-borne creatures
  • 10. Birds
  • 11. Land animals and creeping things
  • 12. Man
  • 13. Woman

Now, Genesis 2 makes vague allusions to things which were already described in Genesis 1 as well as elaborates on rivers and gold and rocks and such in a way that has no discernable importance, but then makes these claims:

  • 1. Man was made before all other creatures from dust and placed in a lifeless Eden
  • 2. Plants are created
  • 3. Out of the ground, "the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them"
  • 4. Adam complains that none are a suitable helper.
  • 5. Woman is made from Adam's rib.



Sing along, friends.... "One of these things is NOT like the other...."

Random Thought

Ignorance is not stupidity; it is just a lack of experience or knowledge. However, being willfully ignorant in opposition to reality should be a prosecutable offense.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Steve Harvey Thinks All Atheists Are Immoral

The following is a letter I just sent to comedian turned religious zealot Steve Harvey. The video which inspired the missive is embedded below. I'll report back if I get an interesting response.

---


Steve: As a (mostly) lifelong atheist, I find it abhorrent that you would infer that people who are not religious are immoral. You made that claim on the Tyra Banks show recently.

Morality has nothing to do with whether or not a person believes in the existence of a deity or not. In fact, take a look at the total number of prisoners who have religious beliefs -- do so, and you will hopefully see it is dishonest to say atheists are the kinds of people who are inherently immoral. Obviously that's just one example. There are many more situations in which religion can lead a person to commit an immoral act that an atheist (or agnostic) would never consider as just.

Consider fundamentalist terrorism, the mutiliation of the genitals of children, bigotry & hatred based on sexual orientation & skin pigmentation, etcetera.

When you make claims that people without supernatural beliefs are bad, you're doing nothing but spouting moldy religious rhetoric that has been disproven throughout history. To claim otherwise is to speak from an ignorant position.

Thank you for your attention. I don't expect to hear back from you but would be happy to engage in discourse if you're interested.


Sincerely,

Rick Sparks
Los Angeles CA

Friday, May 22, 2009

Friday Roundup

CNN is reporting one out of five adults admit to urinating in public pools. Four out of five are obviously liars.

Reviews for the new "Terminator" movie are not pretty. In my world, not only did James Cameron not allow a TV series to be made, he also wrote & directed "Terminator 3" and "Terminator 4." It's nice in here.

I need to find a better class of people to debate religion with. I've written "What part of fuck off don't you understand?" far too many times this week.

Speaking of religion... according to Genesis 2, the character named "god" made a woman only after the man complained none of the animals were suitable helpers. What is the point of being a man (PENIS!) if no woman had been intended to be around? And HOW, exactly, did "Adam" come to decide the animals weren't "suitable?" (This is the result when one leads a fairly secular life and decides to read the "bible" at the age of thirteen.)

I plan to take a moment or two this Memorial Day weekend to think about all the folks who gave their lives defending our country so we can enjoy things like this blog. In some of the nastier parts of the world, I'd likely be flogged.